This means it will leave anyone who's left the path on their own and you without errors. Obviously this is an example pulled out of my rear, but it will ONLY offer the upgrade to clients within your upgrade path. Or has - licensed software - Firefox 24.6 ESRĪND does not have - licensed software - Firefox 24.7 ESR Or has - licensed software - Firefox 24.5 ESR Has - licensed software - Firefox 24.4 ESR Because it's easy to get ahead of the ESR I don't necessarily want to downgrade my users without having a GOOD reason. Now, that said, I've used this logic before with our "supported browsers".įor example, We use Firefox ESR as one of our supported browsers. In my case I include a script to disable java auto update after each and every version of java I push to users. At which point you can upgrade to catch up with the proper process. Isn't that a good error to have? At least it doesn't pull it back down and gives you a notification of sorts that you are behind.
![java 7 update 51 java 7 update 51](https://www.sqlcoffee.com/images/Troubleshooting_161/Troubleshooting161-03.png)
OR Plug-in Version not like "Java 7 Update 3" OR Plug-in Version not like "Java 7 Update 2"
![java 7 update 51 java 7 update 51](https://windows-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/NodeBox_5.png)
OR Plug-in Version not like "Java 7 Update 1" So the only thing i can think of is this:
![java 7 update 51 java 7 update 51](https://youtubewestern.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/4/1/124115039/889599206.jpg)
I know we can't use greater than or less than in criteria ().
#Java 7 update 51 install
But if someone upgrades to a newer version before i have it packaged I start seeing the installation constantly rerun and dumping errors in the jamf.log Error - You are trying to install Java 7 Update 60, however Java 7 Update 65 is already installed. That works great for the most part and reinstalls if anyone removes the software. I have Java RE 7u60 packaged currently and have a smart group setup to deploy to any system without that version.